Sonicbids: No More “Indie” in 2011 (my fault?)

An interesting piece of news to report on in my little “indie” world. Sonicbids, one of the leading companies in the new music industry, announced recently that they were going to phase out using the word “indie”. How did this come about? Well, that’s an interesting story, because it’s kind of my fault :)

It started a few weeks ago with the debate surrounding the Grammy Nominations, and what the word “indie” really meant. Since I had made a movie documenting that very thing, I got involved in the debate with a guest blog post on Hypebot.com. Shortly after, Panos Panay, the founder of Sonicbids, wrote his own blog post about the Grammy Nominations, praising them for finally getting “indie”.

About a week later, Panos wrote another blog post with his 2011 Music Industry Predictions, and one of his predictions is that the word “indie” will become obsolete. Being the “What is INDIE?” guy, I felt I had to respond, so in the comments section of Panos’ blog, I wrote:

“I think the last people to let go of the word will be companies selling products and services to “indie” artists. So my question for you, good sir, is this: Will you lead the way and remove all mentions of the word “indie” from the Sonicbids site and marketing materials?”

Now, before I get to Panos’ response, I will say that I don’t necessarily disagree with him. Any word that has as many meanings and interpretations as the word “indie” is either at best a very nuanced word, or at worst, meaningless. So to move on and stop using the word altogether is definitely an option. However, is it realistic? The industry is flooded with products/services/websites marketing to “indie” artists everyday, so the word must mean something? Just looking at my book shelf, I have:

  • The Indie Bible
  • The Indie Venue Bible
  • Indie Power
  • Indie Marketing Power
  • The Indie Band Survival Guide
  • The New Indie (podcast series)
  • The Indie Band Bible

And there are many more, not to mention the websites and services that use the word in their marketing to artists.

And Sonicbids is one of those websites, with their “indie” pick of the week, their “Sonicbids LOVES Indie” marketing materials, etc. Which is why I called Panos on his prediction of the word becoming obsolete. Would he lead the way and stop using the word? It looks that way, as Panos responded to me a few days later:

“David, you are right taking me to task about removing references to indie music on the site. OK, you got it. We will gradually remove references to indie music on the site within the next 120 days.”

So there you have it, straight from the man himself. Sonicbids will phase out using the word indie. I’m actually not surprised by this, because if anyone is willing to put their money where their mouth is, it’s Panos. However, you can be sure I’ll keep a watchful eye on their website in the next few months :)

But what I’m most curious about is whether other websites/services will follow Sonicbids’ lead. Personally, I don’t think so, but what do you think? Is Panos right? Will the word become obsolete? Or will people continue to use the term? Should be interesting to see how things develop.

Cheers,

Dave “What is INDIE?” Cool

What’s Ahead For 2011 & 2010 Top Musical Moments

I was recently asked by Hypebot.com what I thought would be the most important business and consumer trends that will shape the music industry in 2011, as well as my top musical moments in 2010. You can read my answers here: http://www.hypebot.com/hypebot/2010/12/dave-cool-google-music-could-be-a-game-changer.html

Managed to plug a few Canadian artists in there, which is always fun :)

Cheers,

Dave

Rejected Again: Grant Applications now 0/2

Well, today I received a rejection letter from CALQ (Conseil des arts et des lettres du Québec) for a research and creation grant for my new film. So after getting rejected last month by the Canada Council, that’s 0 for 2 with grant applications for the new film so far. Not exactly the start I was looking for.

I expected the Canada Council rejection as I wasn’t technically eligible for the program I applied for, but the CALQ rejection stings a little more because it was based on an evaluation of the project itself. In other words, the jury of my peers didn’t feel the project was worth funding. Ouch.

Now, both of these grants were for research and development and not for the actual production of the film. There is another round of applications in the Spring for production grants, and you can bet I’ll be sending in applications once again.

On a positive note, since applying for these 2 grants a few months ago, the idea for the film has solidified and I’m much further along in the development than I thought I would be at this point. But like almost every indie artist out there, I’m faced with the challenge of getting the funding needed for my project.

Next steps will be re-applying to Canada Council and CALQ for production grants, seeking out other grants to apply for, but also finalizing plans for alternative funding like sponsorships, fan-funding, private investment, pre-sales, creative alliances, etc.

More news on this project in the New Year…

Cheers,

Dave
(Currently listening to: George Azzi’s EP “Dark rooms have no corners”)

Thank You, Mama Jo

Josie-Anne Huard, better known to her fellow folkies as “Mama Jo”,  announced this week that after over 5 great years on the air, she is ending her radio show “Univers Folk“. The show aired on CHOQ.fm, UQAM’s radio station, and each week Josie-Anne would play great folk music and interview (mostly) local folk artists. It was quite simply the best place for a folk artist to get on radio in Montreal and do an interview. Mama Jo is one of this city’s most dedicated supporters of folk music, and did so much not only for local folk artists and folk music fans, but also folk music venues.

Time and time again when there was a show booked at the Centre St-Ambroise (where I’ve been program director for 3 years), I would notice that the artist was appearing on Univers Folk that week. Her support for the local folk music scene is almost unparalleled and her show will be missed dearly by the community.

A big thanks to Simon and everyone at UQAM radio (CHOQ.fm) who recognized Josie-Anne’s talent and passion and kept her on the air the past 5 years. For any of you reading this that did not get to hear Univers Folk, please have a listen to the archives while they’re still there: http://www.choq.fm/universfolk.html

And thankfully Mama Jo will still be talking about her musical discoveries through her Twitter feed, which you can follow here: http://twitter.com/universfolk

So Mama Jo, THANK YOU for 5 wonderful years of folk music radio and for all of your incredible support for the Montreal folk music community, we are forever grateful :)

Cheers,

Dave “Daddy” Cool

Guest Blog on Hypebot.com

I was thrilled to be invited to write a guest blog re: the “indie” Grammy nominations on Hypebot.com, one of my favorite sources for news on technology and the new music industry. It’s an expanded version of my original blog post, and the big question that I address in the post is: “Where do you draw the line?”

Check out the blog on Hypebot.com: http://www.hypebot.com/hypebot/2010/12/indie-has-arrived-273-grammy-nominations-for-indies-congratulations-paul-mccartney.html

Cheers!

Dave


Montreal Rock’n’Roll Hall of Fame

I was honoured to be part of the jury again this year for the Hour Montreal Rock’n'Roll Hall of Fame. The 2010 inductees have been announced in this week’s Hour: http://www.hour.ca/music/music.aspx?iIDArticle=20909

Cheers,

Dave

Sample CD Marketing Budget

Just a quick post to offer a free resource for any musicians who are preparing a budget for their next album release. I continue to work on the 2nd edition of “Your Successful CD Release” and I’ve updated the sample CD marketing budget:

Download the original Excel file: SAMPLE CD MARKETING BUDGET- EXCEL

Download a PDF version: SAMPLE CD MARKETING BUDGET- PDF

Cheers!

Dave

INDIE Has Arrived: 273 GRAMMY Nominations for Indies! Congratulations…Paul McCartney?

So there was a lot of buzz on the interwebs recently about the Grammy Nominations, notably that 273 “indies” were nominated for awards this year. For a guy who spent 2 years documenting the word INDIE in an effort to find out its true definition, you’d think I’d be thrilled. Indie artists have finally arrived and have been overwhelmingly recognized by the Grammys! Well, not so much. The American Association of Independent Music released their list of members who were nominated for a Grammy, and the list includes, among others:

  • Paul McCartney
  • Robert Plant
  • LeAnn Rimes

And in A2IM’s announcement of these Grammy nominations, Taylor Swift is also referenced as an indie artist. Now, these artists are on this list because of associations with smaller “indie” labels. However, as Paul Resnikoff, Publisher of Digital Music News, correctly points out in a great article on this subject, Major Labels are no doubt doing more of the heavy lifting in terms of promotion and distribution for these artists, so can they truly be considered “indie”?

Short answer? No. As much as I would love to say that Paul McCartney is an indie artist and I’ll interview him for my next film, it just doesn’t add up. And Taylor Swift is certainly no Ani DiFranco. But that brings up the same question as in “What is INDIE?”: where do you draw the line? At one extreme you have an artist who is unsigned, has no label, no distribution, and does not engage in fan-funding or seek money from investors, they do EVERYTHING on their own. At the other extreme, you have Taylor Swift, and not to mention all of the many shades of gray in between that we documented in the film.

So what’s the answer? I recently gave this a lot of thought for an interview on Hypebot.com, and the answer I gave was the following:

“If I were to define it myself, an indie artist is an unsigned artist, plain and simple. There are so many nuances, but if I had to define it quickly, that’s what I would say, although everyone has their own interpretation which is totally valid, as I documented in the film.

And that’s key, indie means different things to different people. If Paul McCartney or Robert Plant win a Grammy this year and in their acceptance speech they talk about how they are proud to be indie artists, then who am I to argue with them? Maybe being “indie” is more of a philosophy/attitude/state of mind rather than a strictly defined term that means only 1 thing.

Or, as Paul from Digital Music News suggests, maybe it’s time to leave that term out of the discussion altogether:

“Meanwhile, the majors lose more power every day, and things are going to look a lot different in five years.  So perhaps as the major label power-base withers, so should the antiquated ‘indie’ term.  Because under the current, vague definitions, almost every artist will be ‘indie’ eventually – not just Taylor Swift.”

I won’t argue with that.

Cheers,

Dave “Indie” Cool