I recently attended the Folk Alliance International Music Conference in Memphis and was shocked by the reaction to Sonicbids in panel discussions and with artists I spoke to. It caused me to question the company, and whether it was still helping indie artists. Had the company “sold out”? Were they now “The Man”? Well, here’s what I found out…
***
A little context:
The Folk Alliance is significant in my life as I filmed several key interviews for my documentary “What is INDIE?” while at the FA in Montreal (Derek Sivers- CD Baby, David Wimble- Indie Bible, Suzanne Glass- Indie-Music.com), and then premiered the film 2 years later at the FA in Austin. But the FA conference in Montreal in 2005 is also where I first met Panos Panay, the founder of Sonicbids.
I’ll admit, when I first met Panos, I wasn’t sure what Sonicbids was all about, what it did, or if it was even a good idea for indie artists to join. But I knew one thing: Panos was passionate and enthusiastic about helping independent artists, so I felt it was worth digging deeper.
So I kept in touch with Panos, and over time we developed a friendship, as we were very much on the same page with our views on the music industry. In the process I got a much better sense of Sonicbids and what it did for musicians. Essentially, Sonicbids removed the gatekeepers and middlemen and allowed indie artists to connect directly with promoters, festivals, conferences, film licensing opportunities, consumer brands and more. No doubt in my mind: just like CD Baby was when it first came onto the scene, Sonicbids was a game changer.
***
OK, back to FA 2010. I was going to a music conference for first time in almost 3 years. After promoting my film until late 2007, I became hyper-focused on my local Montreal music scene the last few years, helping to create and program a new artist-friendly folk music venue in Montreal (http://www.myspace.com/centrestambroise). So I felt a bit rusty, but it didn’t take long to get right back into it as I scheduled a ton of interviews with artists. My film had essentially taken a snapshot of the experience of being an independent artist in 2004/2005, and I was curious how things had changed in the last 5 years.
In those interviews, I asked artists how they were using sites like MySpace, Facebook, Twitter, ReverbNation, and of course, Sonicbids. To my astonishment, the only website that received a worse reaction than MySpace was Sonicbids (more about MySpace in a future blog post). Sonicbids? But they’re awesome! Then in panel discussion after panel discussion, whenever Sonicbids was mentioned, it was usually followed by nervous laughter, like a hot potato that no one wanted to take. When people finally did talk about Sonicbids, nothing positive came out.
I couldn’t believe it. What had happened in the 5 years since I first met Panos? Had Sonicbids changed? Had they lost touch with their original mission of helping indie artists? Well, it turned out I would have an opportunity to ask “the man” himself, as Panos was scheduled to speak at Folk Alliance.
***
It had been a few years since I last saw Panos, and a lot had happened with Sonicbids in that time. Membership on the site had essentially doubled to 210,000+ artists, they were now working with SXSW, one of the biggest music conferences in the world, and they had received roughly $4.5 million dollars in venture capital funding. Combined with all of the negative feedback I was hearing at the conference, even I was starting to wonder if they had lost their way.
Well, it took all of 30 seconds in talking to Panos to put my mind at ease. He was still the same guy I met in 2005, super nice, super enthusiastic, and extremely passionate about helping indie artists. I had a very good conversation with Panos and Tess Cychosz (Member Relations Manager at Sonicbids) about what I was hearing about the company while at Folk Alliance. It was clear that they had heard some of these things before, and they invited me to come to a Sonicbids Member Dinner that night to continue the discussion.
Sonicbids hosts these member dinners all over the world, and many times Panos is there himself. The atmosphere was laid back, and I watched while Panos & Tess hung out with the artists, ate ribs, drank beer and got to know everyone. Every so often the conversation steered towards Sonicbids, it wasn’t a survey, it wasn’t structured, but you could tell that they genuinely wanted to get feedback straight from their members. It was amazing to watch. Panos could have been in any number of meetings/places, but the founder & CEO of the company chose to spend a few hours with Sonicbids members, which speaks volumes about who Panos is.
And although the feedback from the members wasn’t as strongly worded as what I had been hearing at the conference, they were rooted in the same frustrations: pay to play, spending lots of money and not being selected, etc. It was a very open and honest discussion. Panos listened to the artists, and responded to each criticism with his point of view, then asked their opinions on how they would improve Sonicbids. It’s almost too bad that Panos can’t speak to all of the Sonicbids members (and sceptics) directly, because if you hear him talk about helping indie artists with such passion, and when you realize how open he is to getting feedback about Sonicbids for the sake of improving the site (and further helping indie artists), it would no doubt help reduce some of the Sonicbids-bashing that goes on.
***
Obviously this whole experience at Folk Alliance got me thinking about Sonicbids, so here’s my take on the company:
- Before Sonicbids, if you wanted to apply to a festival or music conference, it still cost money to submit. You either had to send a check/money order/online payment before sending your promo kit (which cost money for the physical CD, one-sheet, postage, envelope, etc.). I think sometimes artists forget this, or maybe since Sonicbids has been around for 9 years, it is very possible that many artists weren’t around in the days when you had to snail-mail a money order to pay your submission fees along with your physical CD and press kit (i.e. time consuming, not eco-friendly, and expensive).
- Sonicbids does not keep all of the money from submission fees for opportunities. This seems to be a great source of misunderstanding in the artistic community. In most cases, 70% goes to the promoters, although sometimes it’s a 50/50 split. And Sonicbids is adamant when they take on a new promoter, that if there was a fee before, the fee remains the same as it was.
- Before Sonicbids, it was nearly impossible without an agent, manager or inside connection to gain access to many of the opportunities found on Sonicbids, most notably film licensing, video game licensing, and working with large brands like the GAP, Delta Airlines, to name a few. They not only make it easier to connect to opportunities, they also actively create new opportunities for artists, sometimes spending their own money to do so. They literally put their money where their mouth is, which is pretty damn cool.
- Sonicbids offers partial reimbursement for international travel expenses, so if you do get booked at an overseas festival/conference but can’t afford to go, Sonicbids might help get you there. In other words, they take an active role in not only helping to create opportunities for artists, but also in helping to get artists to those opportunities. Again, I think this is pretty awesome. (*Update: they just did this very thing, helping to send a band to tour China: http://panosbrew.sonicbids.com/sonicbids-china-tour-artist-announced/ )
- One criticism of Sonicbids is that it is a monopoly, and I guess in some ways it is. There are festivals and conferences that now book exclusively through Sonicbids, but there is a reason for that: from a promoter’s point of view, Sonicbids is a dream come true. Simply put, Sonicbids saves an incredible amount of time for promoters in finding/selecting artists. But because certain festivals & conferences use Sonicbids exclusively, it in a sense “forces” artists to use the site (and pay the monthly subscription fee) if they want to apply to certain opportunities. Even I can admit that this is not ideal. Although I think there is tremendous value in what Sonicbids offers to artists, I can understand how artists might feel bitter when they have to use the site to apply to a particular festival (and pay the monthly fee).
***
So even though I am big fan of Sonicbids, there is always room for improvement. Here is my personal wish list for changes that Sonicbids can make to improve their service:
1. Pay-to-play & the monthly fee: I personally feel that Sonicbids should offer 2 membership options on their site: Regular membership and Premium membership:
- Regular Membership (Free): Artists can sign up for an account for free and create an EPK, but they would still have to pay to submit to opportunities. This would be geared towards artists who play mostly their home town and just want to apply to a few select opportunities every year, i.e. “lite” users.
- Premium Membership (Subscription): Artists pay the $6 monthly membership fee and are allowed to apply to a set amount of opportunities per month for free. There are no doubt opportunities that would not have had a submission fee before Sonicbids existed (certain radio shows, Podcasts, smaller clubs/venues for example) which could fall into this category. But there are still certain conferences and festivals that always have, and always will, charge a submission fee. So both Regular & Premium Members would still have to pay to submit to those opportunities. The Premium Membership option would be for “heavy users” of the site; touring artists or artists looking to apply to many clubs/venues/festivals, etc. So they would pay $6/month, but get free access to a set amount of opportunities per month in exchange. Maybe other premium features could include things like embedding your Gig Calendar and e-mailing out your EPK.
2. Eliminate Supersonic EPK: I’m sure everyone at Sonicbids has heard this many times before, but in the age of YouTube and Vimeo (and countless other free video hosting sites) I would love to see Sonicbids stop charging artists to upload a video onto their EPK. If it’s a server issue, then maybe they could let artists embed a video from either YouTube or Vimeo in their EPK. It might be easier said than done, but I think it would be the right thing to do.
3. Make Sonicbids THE place where artists update all of their sites: MySpace, Facebook, Twitter, etc. Right now ReverbNation and ArtistData are battling it out for supremacy in this field, but Sonicbids has the membership base and resources to win outright, and they could add incredible value for their members in the process. This could even be a service offered in the “Premium” membership in the scenario I mentioned above.
4. Make most EPK elements visible on 1 page: It is clear that most artists are tired of MySpace, but they can’t close their accounts because there are still people who use MySpace as their main reference. And who are those people? Many of them are venue bookers, and as someone who booked a folk music venue for 2 years, I can attest to this. MySpace was the first place I visited to hear an artist because of the (relatively) uniform look and ability to find a photo, music, calendar dates, bio and maybe a video all on the same page, in essentially the same place as on every other artist page on MySpace. If Sonicbids tweaked the look of the artist EPKs to incorporate most of the key elements onto 1 page, venue bookers might be more inclined to use Sonicbids in the same way they use MySpace, and in the process, allow artists to finally let go of MySpace once and for all (wishful thinking?).
***
So I hope for any artists that read this it gave you some insight into Sonicbids and gave you a better sense of the company, and of Panos. They are not perfect, and yes improvements can be made, but they are certainly not “the man”. They are there to help, and are always looking for ways to improve. And if this blog post made me sound like I am a cheerleader for Sonicbids, well, I will admit that in some ways I am (Tess Cychosz, the Member Relations Manager, even joked that Panos and I are “BFFs”). But I call it like I see it, and as long as Sonicbids stays true to their original mission and keeps creating opportunities for indie artists, then I will keep waving my pom-poms ;-)
Cheers,
Dave
P.S. - What do YOU think about Sonicbids? Do you use the site? What do you like about it? What don’t you like about it? What would YOU do to improve it? Please feel free to comment on this blog post.








Interesting little post… We didn’t get to make the member dinner in Memphis @ Folk Alliance, but I’m glad people voiced their opinions. We really like Sonicbids. We get quite a large number of hits on our EPK, BUT… Never really get accepted to anything we apply to. We have paid for a Supersonic membership for about 2 years and lately it just feels like we’re throwing money away. I sometimes wonder if the places we apply to are even getting our submissions. Who knows. We just paid for another year of it so we’ll see what comes.
Thanks for reading the blog post, appreciate it. Too bad you guys weren’t there for the member dinner, it was a good time!
I kind of agree with you re: Supersonic membership, not my favorite thing about Sonicbids, but I am hoping they will make adjustments to their membership structure in the near future.
As for places/promoters not getting/reviewing your submissions, I went on the Sonicbids site and found this info in their Support Center:
***
Information Center
Artist Information Center > Gig & Submission FAQs >
=> It doesn’t look like a promoter even reviewed my EPK. What gives?
That’s a fair concern, but rest assured. All promoters using the Submission Tracker are contractually obligated to review each and every submission. In fact, promoters using the Submission Tracker can’t even send you a status message without first opening up your EPK. Also, if you made a song submission, they have to first play your song before sending you a status. (Note: if the gig does not require a song for submission, the promoter is technically not required to listen to a song, but must view the EPK.)
When the promoter sends you your status update, you can view your selection status within the “My Submissions” widget of your account. (You will receive an email when the status is updated). When you click on the status of your submission in your account, a window will pop up and let you know the date that the promoter first reviewed your EPK:
The way our system is set up, promoters must view your EPK in order to send you a “Selected,” “Interested” or “Not Selected” message. In the event that one of your submissions is overdue for a Submission Tracker update you can withdraw the submission for a full refund to site credit.
***
So it looks like if a promoter doesn’t update your status, you can withdraw the submission and get site credit. Might be worth watching out for…
Cheers,
DC
A couple things bother me about Sonicbids.The membership renewal without prior notification is the main reason I dropped them. I realize there is the “fine print on the contract” and so on but the first notice I had of renewal was on my credit card statement and I did not appreciate feeling like the fee was “sneaked past me.”
Secondly, many of the venues you have to pay to submit to are a total waste of time. I have played many of the places listed and it was easy to book dates there with a phone call. Paying to submit to a place that does not pay anything makes no sense to me. Who makes money on these listings? The venue and Sonic Bids.
Might be too strong to call it a scam. . . might not. It is obvious that there is a bigger advantage to Sonicbids and many of the venues than there is for a musician or performer. In someways this is similar to Taxi, whose main goal is to sign up members, not to do the thing they sell.
I was a former Sonicbids customer and me and my band members are not happy. I also feel Sonicbids is a total scam. In the age of Reverbnation & MySpace where I can create an EPK anyways for free, who needs Sonicbids? So what they get $4.5 million in funding. What’s in it for me? Another total scam. Middlemen & gatekeepers? Please…… now way!!!!!! Sonicbids is none of that, what a joke Sonicbids is. Yes, I was also at Folk Alliance, the musicians really hate Sonicbids like Poison. Sonicbids is only in it for themselves and for the money. They don’t impress me with SXSW, which is another scam. If you want to perform in great conferences, you need to know the people and network, joining Sonicbids will not do you any good at all. Panos is only thinking of money all the time and not us musicians.